Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 23416 of 2004 Petitioner :- Ved Prakash Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. through Secretary Commissioner Board Of Revenue & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Dwivedi, P.N. Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. This is an application seeking recall of order dated 23.02.2018.
2. Cause shown for non-appearance is sufficient.
3. Order dated 23.02.2018 is hereby recalled.
4. The application, accordingly, stands allowed.
Order Date :- 21.12.2018 Siddhant Sahu
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 23416 of 2004 Petitioner :- Ved Prakash Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. through Secretary Commissioner Board Of Revenue & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Dwivedi, P.N. Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Order dated 23.02.2018 having been recalled vide order of date passed on Recall Application, writ petition is restored to its original number.
2. As requested and agreed by learned counsel for parties, I proceed to hear and decide this case at this stage finally.
3. Heard Sri Vinod Dwivedi, learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State and perused the material available on record.
4. Admittedly, petitioner was initially working as Collection Peon in Tehsil-Basti Sadar from 21.01.1995 to 31.12.1995. Thereafter, he has been engaged as Collection Amin and then Seasonal Collection Amin on ad-hoc basis from time to time.
5. When respondents found that recovery made by petitioner was inadequate, therefore, he has not been engaged further.
6. When questioned, learned counsel for petitioner could not dispute this fact that recovery made by petitioner was inadequate and there is no right of petitioner to claim continuous engagement.
7. In view of above, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. The writ petition lacks merit and is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 21.12.2018 Siddhant Sahu