Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2908 of 2019 Revisionist :- Ved Prakash Prajapati Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Ashutosh Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.
This criminal revision has been preferred against the judgement and order dated 15.06.2019 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, (F.T.C.-2016), Mahoba in Case No.63 of 2019 (Smt. Kamlesh vs. Ved Prakash Prajapati) u/s 125 Cr.P.C., P.S.-Khanna, District-Mahoba whereby opposite party no.2 has been awarded Rs.3000/- per month as maintenance from the date of order.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. Perused the record.
Counsel for the revisionist has not been able to point out any such illegality, impropriety or incorrectness in the impugned order which may persuade this Court to interfere in the same. Impugned order reflects judicial application of mind. Issues were duly framed and the evidence and circumstances were well discussed in the impugned order by the court below. There were clear allegations of committing cruelty upon the wife and she has been grossly neglected and ill-treated. Fixing Rs.3000/- per month as maintenance amount cannot be said to be either excessive or disproportionate in the present days of high price rise. The provisions of Section- 125 of Cr.P.C. are beneficiary in nature and are meant to provide some succour to the neglected wives in order to prevent them from vagrancy and destitution. This Court does not see any such element of perversity which may persuade this court to make any interference in the impugned order. There is no good reason to take a different view in the matter.
The present revision, therefore, stands dismissed.
Order Date :- 30.7.2019 M. Kumar