Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ved Prakash Chaubey vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 27
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 36484 of 2014 Petitioner :- Ved Prakash Chaubey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Heard Mr A. K. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr Vivek Rai, learned Chief Standing Counsel, and perused the record.
It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the relief claimed herein has already been granted and as such, the present writ petition has become infructuous.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 21.8.2019 RavindraKSingh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ved Prakash Chaubey vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 August, 2019
Judges
  • Vivek Varma
Advocates
  • Anil Kumar Mishra