Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Vatika vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|06 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 89
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8188 of 2021 Applicant :- Smt. Vatika Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ishwar Chandra Tyagi
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Krishna Kumar Singh, learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
At the very outset, learned counsel for applicant contends that applicant does not wish to press this application for anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, present application be dismissed as not pressed. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the same.
In view of above, present application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 6.4.2021 HSM
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Vatika vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
06 April, 2021
Judges
  • Rajeev Misra
Advocates
  • Krishna Kumar Singh