IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI W. P. NO.59277 OF 2016 (T-RES) BETWEEN:
1. VASUMATHI SINGHVI W/O UMED RAJ SINGHVI AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 2. UMED RAJ SINGHVI S/O LATE SRI HEMRAJ SINGHVI AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS BOTH THE PETITIONERS RESIDING AT #G-3/102, SRINIDHI NIWAS, KSRTC LAYOUT, CHICKALSANDRA, BENGALURU- 560 061 .. PETITIONERS (By Sri SANJAY H. SETHIYA, ADVOCATE) AND COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, NO.17-B, IAEA HOUSE I.P.ESTATE, M.G.MARG, NEW DELHI – 110 002.
.. RESPONDENT (BY SRI GANAPATHI HEGDE, ADVOCATE) *** THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN RELATION TO THE APPLICATION FOR REFUND AND REWARD DT. 30.10.2013 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE RESPONDENT, DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO INVESTIGATE THE MATTER AS TO ENSURE THAT THE AMOUNT COLLECTED BY DEVELOPER AS ‘SERVICE TAX’ IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ENSURE THE DEVELOPER HAS BEEN DULY DEPOSITED THE SAID TAX WITH THE GOVERNMENT AND ALSO TO DIRECT RESPONDENT TO COLLECT THE SERVICE TAX FROM THE DEVELOPER, ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER The learned counsel for petitioner filed a memo dated 29.03.2019 seeking to dismiss the present writ petition withdrawn.
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE VK