IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI WRIT APPEAL NO.209 OF 2012 (LR) BETWEEN:
VASUDEVA KINI SINCE DEAD BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES SON OF PADURANGA KINI 1. MAMMAI BAI AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, WIFE OF LATE VASUDEVA P. KINI.
2. N. SRINIVAS V. KINI AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, SON OF LATE VASUDEVA P. KINI.
3. N. USHA KINI AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, WIFE OF RAVINDRA KINI, DAUGHTER OF LATE VASUDEVA P. KINI.
4. PRAKASH KINI AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, SON OF LATE VASUDEVA P. KINI.
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NARAVI VILLAGE AND POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT.
...APPELLANTS (BY SRI S.K. ACHARYA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, BENGALURU-560001.
2. THE LAND TRIBUNAL BELTHANGADY, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.
3. MEENAKSHI AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, WIFE OF NAGESH KINI, RESIDING AT NALKEDABETTU, NITTE VILLAGE, KARKALA TALUK AND POST, UDUPI DISTRICT.
4. GANESH SHENOY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, SON OF LATE VAMAN SHENOY, RESIDING AT NALKEDABETTU, NITTE VILLAGE, KARKALA TALUK AND POST, UDUPI DISTRICT.
5. MADHAVA SHENOY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, SON OF LATE VAMAN SHENOY, RESIDING AT NALKEDABETTU, NITTE VILLAGE, KARKALA TALUK AND POST, UDUPI DISTRICT.
6. GOPALA SHENOY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SON OF LATE VAMANA SHENOY, RESIDING AT NALKEDABETTU, NITTE VILLAGE, KARKALA TALUK AND POST, UDUPI DISTRICT.
7. N. KESHAVA SHENOY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, SON OF LATE VAMAN SHENOY, RESIDING AT NALKEDABETTU, NITTE VILLAGE, KARKALA TALUK AND POST, UDUPI DISTRICT.
8. N. ANANDA SHENOY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, SON OF LATE VAMAN SHENOY, RESIDING AT NALKEDABETTU, NITTE VILLAGE, KARKALA TALUK AND POST, UDUPI DISTRICT.
VENKATESH KAMATH SINCE DEAD BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES 9. PRADEEP KAMATH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, SON OF LATE VENKATESH KAMATH, MAVINAKERE VILLAGE, KALASA POST, MOODIGERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI LAKSHMINARAYAN, AGA FOR R-1 AND R-2;
SRI K. SHASHIKANTH PRASAD, ADV. FOR R-3 TO R-8; SRI A. KESHAVA BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R-9) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WRIT PETITION NO.6126 OF 2010 (LR) DATED 14.12.2011 AND ALLOW THE WRIT APPEAL, ETC.
***** THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT None appears for the appellant nor any representation is made even though the matter was called on two occasions. It is apparent that the appellant is not interested to prosecute this matter. Hence, the appeal is dismissed.
Sd/- Sd/-
JUDGE JUDGE rsk/-