Perused the note placed by the registry as well as heard learned advocate Mr.R.C.Jani for the applicant and took into consideration the earlier order dated 07.03.2012.
In the earlier order dated 07.03.2012, while admitting this matter and issuing rule, it was further ordered that "Interim-relief earlier granted vide order dated 14.02.2011, shall continue." Now, as per the office note placed by the registry, the aforesaid order dated 14.02.2011 was not passed in the instant matter but, it was passed in Criminal Misc. Application No.1747 of 2011 for restoration and by allowing the said application vide order dated 14.02.2011, the instant matter was ordered to be restored in terms of the prayer made in Para-8(B) in Criminal Misc. Application No.1747 of 2011.
In above view of the matter, after considering the note placed by the registry, so also considering the submissions advanced by learned advocate Mr.Jani, learned advocate for the applicant, this Court is of the opinion that in place of "Interim relief earlier granted vide order dated 14.02.2011, shall continue." referred in the order dated 07.03.2012, shall be now read as "Interim relief in terms of Para 19(C) is granted". The office note put by the registry is replied accordingly.
(J.C.UPADHYAYA,J.) Girish Top