IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CCC NO.151 OF 2019 AND CCC NOs.234-238 OF 2019 (CIVIL) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. VASANTHA KUMARI WIFE OF A.N. VIJAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.41 16TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN ROAD LAKKASANDRA BENGALURU-560 030.
2. SRI J.S. ACHUTHRAM GUPTA SON OF LATE J. SADASIVA GUPTA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.23, 2ND FLOOR 1ST CROSS, MUNESWARA BLOCK PALACE GUTTAHALLI MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU-560 003.
3. SRI J.S. SHANMUGANANDA SON OF LATE J. SADASIVA GUPTA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.235 1ST ‘F’ CROSS, 7TH MAIN 3RD STAGE, 4TH BLOCK BASAVESHWARANAGAR BENGALURU-560 079.
4. SMT. J.S. NIRMALA DEVI DAUGHTER OF LATE J. SADASIVA GUPTA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.31, 7TH CROSS SHIVANANDA NAGAR BENGALURU-560 072.
5. SMT. J.S. LALITHAMBA DAUGHTER OF LATE J. SADASIVA GUPTA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.27, KHATHA NO.14/1 G.R. SAGAR APARTMENTS BEHIND HOSA ROAD NAGANATHAPURA BENGALURU-560 100.
6. SMT. J.S. ANURADHA DAUGHTER OF LATE J. SADASIVA GUPTA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.31/A, 7TH CROSS, SHIVANANDA NAGAR BENGALURU-560 072.
COMPLAINANT NO.3 IS THE GPA HOLDER OF COMPLAINANT NOS.1,2,4,5 AND 6 ...COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI:T.P.VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE) AND:
SHRI RAKESH SINGH, IAS MAJOR FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE COMPLAINANTS COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU.
(BY SRI:M.N.SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE) ...ACCUSED THESE CCCs ARE FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO TAKE COGNIZANCE OF THE WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE DIRECTIONS ISSUED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WRIT PETITION NO.30920 OF 2017 DATED 11.10.2018 AT ANNEXURE-A AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED.
***** THESE CCCs COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER These petitions are filed on the ground that the order dated 11.10.2018 passed in Writ Petition No.30920 of 2017 by the learned Single Judge, has been disobeyed.
2. In terms whereof, the respondent was directed to consider the representation of the petitioners within an outer limit of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
3. A counter affidavit is filed by the accused in the Court today. He has tendered an unconditional apology for the delay in complying with the order of the learned Single Judge within the time frame. He has also filed Annexure-R1, the endorsement dated 29.05.2019 indicating the consideration of the representation of the petitioners.
4. The apology is accepted and the delay is condoned.
In view of the compliance of the order of the learned Single Judge, the proceedings are dropped.
Sd/- Sd/-
JUDGE JUDGE *bgn/-