IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.01.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN Writ Petition No.44390 of 2016 and W.M.P.Nos.38253 and 38254 of 2016 M/s.Varalakshmi Starch Industries (P) Ltd., rep. by its Director A.Vinoth Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.
1 The Superintendent of Police Dharmapuri District Dharmapuri
2 The Deputy Superintendent of Police Harur Taluk Harur
3 The Inspector Police Pappireddipatty Police Station Pappireddipatty Dharmapuri District
4 Pappireddipatty Sago Factory Anna Thozhir Sangam (Varalakshmi Starch Industries (P) Ltd) Rep. by its President G.Rajesh Kumar Pappireddipatty Post & Taluk Dharmapuri District ... Respondents Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to provide appropriate at adequate police protection to the petitioner company's factory situated at Pappireddipatty, Dharmapuri District, by taking suitable action against the fourth respondent and its members and forbear them from trespassing and laying siege at the entrance of the factory and ensure the smooth operations, safety and security of the staff, men and machinery of the petitioner's Factory.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Arulmurugan For Respondents : Mr.C.Emalias, Addl. Public Prosecutor, for R1 to R3 ORDER The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition for a mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to provide appropriate adequate police protection to the petitioner company's factory situated at Pappireddipatty, Dharmapuri District, by taking suitable action against the fourth respondent and its members and forbear them from trespassing and laying siege at the entrance of the factory and ensure the smooth operations, safety and security of the staff, men and machinery of the petitioner's Factory.
2. Today, when the matter was taken up for consideration, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner produced a copy of communication of the third respondent dated 25.12.2016, wherein the third respondent directed the fourth respondent and its members not to cause any untoward incident by blocking the vehicles and threatening the employees of the petitioner company, who report for work. Otherwise, necessary legal action will be taken against them.
3. Recording the statement made in the communication of the third respondent dated 25.12.2016, the present writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.
24.01.2017 Index:Yes/No sbi To
1 The Superintendent of Police Dharmapuri District Dharmapuri
2 The Deputy Superintendent of Police Harur Taluk Harur
3 The Inspector Police Pappireddipatty Police Station Pappireddipatty Dharmapuri District R.MAHADEVAN, J sbi W.P.No.44390 of 2016 DATED: 24.1.2017