Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Vanshika D Raheja W/O vs Vijaya Bank Mysore And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|23 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD W.P.No.42198 OF 2015(GM-RES) BETWEEN:
Smt. Vanshika D Raheja W/o Dinesh Aged 31 years Residing at No.7, Ground floor Ramaiah Compound 5th A Cross, Nagappa Street Palace Guttahalli Bangalore-560 003. … Petitioner (By Smt.Vanitha K.R., Advocate) AND:
1. Vijaya Bank Mysore Road Branch No.152, 2nd Main, 7th Cross Chamarajpet, Bengaluru-560018 Represented by its Authorised Officer.
2. Ramesh K.
S/o Late. Kannappa Aged 46 years 3. Chandra Manikkam W/o K. Ramesh Aged 44 years Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are Residing at No.7, Ramaiah Compound 5th A Cross, Nagappa Street Palace Guttahalli Bengaluru-560 003. ... Respondents (By Sri. K.V. Lokesh, Advocate for R1: R2 and R3 are served and unrepresented) This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the R1 not to take physical possession of the writ petition schedule properties and etc.
This writ petition, coming on for preliminary hearing ‘B’ Group this day, the Court, made the following:
ORDER The petitioner is before this Court seeking to protect her possession in respect of the petition schedule property.
2. The respondent No. 1 – Bank had initiated action under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of the property. Since the petitioner claims to be a lessee in respect of the property, this Court through the interim order dated 30.09.2015 had stayed the dispossession of the petitioner.
3. Though the respondents have filed their objection statement and application for vacating stay and disputed the claim of the petitioner, the issues relating to tenancy and lease-hold rights are also to be decided in an appeal filed under Section 17(4A) of the SARFAESI Act before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (for short ‘the DRT’), the petitioner is required to be relegated to the remedy of appeal.
4. However, since this Court had granted the interim order, such protection is required to be granted to the petitioner till the appeal is taken up for consideration by the DRT. This is however subject to the condition that the petitioner shall file such appeal before the DRT within three weeks from this date.
Petition is accordingly disposed of.
Registry, to return the papers if any, sought for by the petitioner.
Sd/- JUDGE Cm/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Vanshika D Raheja W/O vs Vijaya Bank Mysore And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
23 January, 2019
Judges
  • H T Narendra Prasad