Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Vanrajsinh vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|08 May, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that considering the nature of allegations and role attributed to the applicant, by imposing suitable conditions, the applicant may be enlarged on bail. It is also submitted that applicant is in jail since 17.02.2012.
2. Heard learned APP for the respondent - State.
3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record of the case and taking into consideration the facts of the case, nature of allegations, role attributed to the accused, that the offences alleged are triable by learned JMFC, this application is allowed. However, considering the fact that the other offences are also registered against the present applicant, some strict conditions are required to be imposed. The applicant is ordered to be enlarged on bail in connection with C.R.No.I-18 of 2012 of Lakhtar Police Station, District Surendranagar for the offences punishable under sections 365, 392, 427, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, on furnishing bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the lower Court and on conditions that the applicant shall :
[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or abuse liberty;
[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;
[c] maintain law and order;
[d] mark presence before the concerned Police Station on every 1st and 15th day of English Calender month between 11.00 a.m. and 2 p.m for six months;
[e] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;
[f] furnish the address of residence at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this Court;
[g] surrender passport, if any, to the Lower Court immediately.
[h] shall not enter into the limits of Surendranagar district for six months except for marking presence and attending the trial.
4. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to take appropriate action in the matter.
5. At the trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by the prima facie observations made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.
6. Bail before the Lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. Rule is made absolute. Direct service is permitted.
( M.D.Shah, J ) srilatha Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vanrajsinh vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
08 May, 2012