Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Vanitha W/O Chandappa Poojary vs B Mohammed And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|31 October, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.NARENDAR M.F.A. NO.6460/2017 (MV) BETWEEN:
VANITHA W/O CHANDAPPA POOJARY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT. BOVINAPADY HOUSE BANTWAL TALUK.
…. APPELLANT (BY SRI. ANISH ACHARYA, ADV., (ABSENT)) AND:
1. B. MOHAMMED AGED MAJOR S/O SAYYED D.NO.12/398 MITHABAIL HOUSE MOODA VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK.
2. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY BANTWAL BRANCH OFFICE GANESH BUILDING BANTWAL TALUK.
… RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:26-9-2016 PASSED IN MVC No.1372/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
JUDGMENT This court by order dated 26.07.2018 had ordered that the office objections be complied within two weeks, failing which, appeal shall stand dismissed.
2. Office note states that office objections are not complied with. It reflects the disinterest on the part of the appellant and the lack of diligence. Hence, the order dated 26.07.2018 has taken effect.
The appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE Chs* CT-MS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vanitha W/O Chandappa Poojary vs B Mohammed And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
31 October, 2019
Judges
  • G Narendar