Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Vaishnavi Ananya Sports Recreation vs The Superintendent Of Police And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|08 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION No.33566/2019 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
Vaishnavi Ananya Sports (Recreation) Club (R), A Society registered under the Provisions of Societies Registration Act, No.666, Santhe Maala, Hunsur Main Road, Belavadi Post, Mysore -570027.
Represented by its Secretary. ...Petitioner (By Sri. Sanath Kumar K.M., Advocate) AND:
1. The Superintendent of Police, Mysuru District, Mysuru -570001.
2. Circle Inspector of Police, Vijayanagar, Mysuru City, Mysuru -571007.
3. Sub-Inspector of Police, Vijayanagar, Mysuru City, Mysuru -571 007. … Respondents (By Sri. K. Dilip Kumar, HCGP) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents not to insist upon the petitioner to obtain license to carry on the lawful activities in the premises of the petitioner’s association either under the police Act or under the provisions of Licensing and Controlling of Places of Public Amusement order and not to interfere in carrying out lawful activities such as rummy, chess, volley ball, ball badminton, carom, skill games like rummy, jackpot, best of seven including cultural and recreational activities in consonance with the by-law of the Society.
This Writ Petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R Sri. K. Dilip Kumar, High Court Government Pleader is directed to take notice for respondents.
2. The petitioner in the above writ petition has sought for a direction to declare that the petitioner is not required to obtain any permission or license under the provisions of Licensing and Controlling of Places of Public Amusement order to play indoor games such as rummy, chess, carom, billiards/snooker, skilled games and other indoor and outdoor games for the benefit of its members and further to direct the respondents not to insist the petitioner to obtain the license under the provisions of Licensing and Controlling of Places of the Public Amusement Order to carry on recreational activities by the members of petitioner’s association.
3. It is contended by the petitioner that it is an Association registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960. The object of the Association is to provide facilities for recreation and entertainment such as to conduct outdoor and indoor games like rummy, chess, carom, billiards/snooker, skilled games etc. The respondent police are interfering with the functioning of the Association without any legal basis. The petitioner Association is not required to obtain any license from the respondents under any provisions of law, and therefore, the petitioner is before this Court for the relief sought for.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties to the lis.
5. Sri. Sanath Kumar K.M., learned counsel for the petitioner, reiterating the grounds urged in the writ petition, contended that the petitioner is running recreational activities and is not indulged in any illegal activities and therefore, respondents cannot insist or interfere with the petitioner’s legal activities. The conduct of the respondents is illegal and therefore, sought to allow the writ petition.
6. Per contra, Sri K. Dilip Kumar, HCGP submits that the respondents will not interfere with the recreational activities of the petitioner, if conducted legally. Only if the petitioner indulges in illegal activities, then the respondents will take action in accordance with law. The said submission is placed on record.
7. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed off with the following directions: -
(i) The petitioner shall install within a period of six weeks, CC TV cameras, at all the places of access to its members and also at all the places, wherein game/s is/are played by the members. The CC TV footage of atleast prior 15 days’ period shall be made available by the petitioner, to the police, as and when called upon to do so.
(ii) The petitioner shall issue identity card(s) to all its member(s), which shall be produced by the member(s), when called upon by the police, during the raid(s) and surveillance etc.
(iii) The petitioner shall not allow any non- member(s) or the guest(s) of the member(s), to make use of its premises for the purpose of playing any kind of game(s) or recreational activities.
(iv) The petitioner shall not permit any activity by any of its member(s), by indulging in acts of amusement, falling within the definition of Ss.2 (14) & 2 (15) of the Act and shall not permit any game(s) of chance as per Explanation (II) of Sub-section (7) of Section 2 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The member(s) shall not be allowed to play any kind of game(s) with stakes or make any profit or gain out of the game(s) played.
(v) The petitioner shall put proper mechanism in place and shall ensure that no game(s) is played in any unlawful manner by the member(s). If the police find that any of the game/s played is/are contrary to any law and in violation of the settled practice, it is open for them to take action against petitioner and the offenders, in accordance with law.
(vi) The jurisdictional police shall have liberty to visit premises periodically and/or on receipt of any information about any unlawful activity being carried on in the petitioner’s premises.
(vii) The respondents are directed not to interfere with the lawful recreational activities carried on by the members of the petitioner – Club/Association.
(viii) It is made clear that this order would not come in the way of the jurisdictional police invoking the provisions of the Act and taking action in accordance with law, if the member(s) of the petitioner are found to have indulged in any unlawful or immoral activities.
Ordered accordingly.
BVK Sd/- JUDGE
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vaishnavi Ananya Sports Recreation vs The Superintendent Of Police And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
08 November, 2019
Judges
  • B Veerappa