Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

V Venkateshappa And Others vs The Deputy Commissioner District Administrative Office And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|05 December, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.13747/2017 (KLR-RES-PIL) BETWEEN:
1. V.VENKATESHAPPA S/O VENKATANA BHOVI AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS 2. CHIKKAVENKATAPPA S/O VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 3. PANDAPPA S/O RAMABHOVI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 4. H.HANUMATAPPA S/O HANUMANTAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT VADDARAPALYA SUGATURU HOBLI KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT – 563 101 ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI SHANKARAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE KOLAR KOLAR DISTRICT – 563 101 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KOLAR SUB-DIVISION, KOLAR – 563 101 3. THE TAHASILDAR, KOLAR TALUK KOLAR – 563 101 4. THE SECRETARY MADANAHALLI GRAMA PANCHAYATI MADANAHALLI KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT – 563 101 5. M.T.VENKATESHAPPA S/O TATTAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 6. M.KRISHNAPPA S/O M.T.MYLAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS – 563 101 BOTH RESPONDENT NOS. 5 & 6 ARE R/AT MULLAHALLI VILLAGE SUGATURU HOBLI KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT – 563 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI R.DEVDAS, PRL. GOVT. ADV FOR R1 TO R3; SRI G.PAPI REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R5 & R6; R4 SERVED & UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 4 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONERS DATED 29.12.2016 AT ANNEXURE-C AND DATED 09.01.2017 AT ANNEXURE-D, E AND F FOR CHANGE OF REVENUE ENTRIES IN THE NAME OF SRI ANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE IN RESPECT OF GOVERNMENT LAND OF GUNDUTOPU TO THE EXTENT OF 1 ACRE 20 GUNTAS IN SY. NO.33 OF MULLAHALLI VILLAGE, SUGATURU HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Ag.CJ (Oral):
1. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, after arguing the matter for sometime, submits that the writ petition may be disposed of by granting leave to the petitioners to challenge the endorsement bearing No. J¯ï.J£ï.r/¹.Dgï/386/2016-17 dated 18.03.2017 (Annexure-R1) issued by respondent No.2 before the statutory authority, in accordance with law.
2. Leave sought for is granted. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Petition disposed of.
Sd/-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- JUDGE KSR
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

V Venkateshappa And Others vs The Deputy Commissioner District Administrative Office And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
05 December, 2017
Judges
  • H G Ramesh
  • P S Dinesh Kumar