Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

V. Sundararajan vs M/S. South Indian Bank Limited

Madras High Court|07 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Prayer in W.P.No.2878 of 2017: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the order dated 6/1/2017 passed by the Hon'ble Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, in I.A.No.963 of 2015 in M.A.No.34 of 2010 in so far in relating to the direction to the petitioners to deposit a sum of Rs.4,12,000/- within four weeks from the date of order.
Prayer in W.P.No.2879 of 2017: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the order dated 6/1/2017 passed by the Hon'ble Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, in I.A.No.926 of 2015 in M.A.No.97 of 2010 in so far in relating to the direction to the petitioners to deposit a sum of Rs.9,10,000/- within four weeks from the date of order.
For petitioners ... Mr.G.Ethirajulu
- - - - - -
C O M M O N O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by S.Manikumar,J) Though Mr.Sundararajan, Proprietor of M/s. Sri Ambigai Silks, Kancheepuram/writ petitioners, assailed the correctness of the orders made in M.A.Nos.34 and 97 of 2010, after making submissions, Mr.G.Ethirajulu, learned counsel for the writ petitioners submitted that the deposit, as ordered by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, would be made, if time is extended by four weeks from today.
2. Submission of the learned counsel is placed on record.
3. Having regard to the above, there is no need to delve into the merits of challenge made in W.P.Nos.2878 and 2879 of 2017. While declining to interfere with the orders impugned and taking note of the submissions stated supra, time is extended by four weeks from today, to make the deposit, as ordered by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai in the above said proceedings.
4. Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

V. Sundararajan vs M/S. South Indian Bank Limited

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
07 February, 2017