Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

V S Prabhu vs The Inspector General Of Registration Office Of The Inspector General Of Registration Santhome

Madras High Court|22 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.09.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.25435 of 2017 V.S.Prabhu ...Petitioner v.
1 The Inspector General of Registration Office of the Inspector General of Registration Santhome, Chennai
2 The District Registrar District Registrar office Coimbatore
3 The Sub Registrar Ganapathy Sub Registrar Office Coimbatore ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to dispose the representation of the petitioner dated 02.06.2016 as per the provisions of The Registration Act 1908 and Circular No.67 dated 03.11.2011.
For Petitioner : Mr.Guruprasad For Respondents : Mr.S.Navaneethan Addl. Govt. Pleader O R D E R Mr.S.Navaneethan, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to dispose of his representation dated 02.06.2016 as per the provisions of The Registration Act 1908 and Circular No.67 dated 03.11.2011.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in spite of the petitioner's representation dated 02.06.2016, the 2nd respondent has not passed any order so far.
4. Mr.S.Navaneethan, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents submitted that the 2nd respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 02.06.2016, and pass orders, in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 02.06.2016 and pass orders, in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested parties, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Index: Yes/No Rj To
1 The Inspector General of Registration Office of the Inspector General of Registration Santhome, Chennai
2 The District Registrar District Registrar office Coimbatore
3 The Sub Registrar Ganapathy Sub Registrar Office Coimbatore 22.09.2017 M.DURAISWAMY,J.
Rj W.P.No.25435 of 2017 22.09.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

V S Prabhu vs The Inspector General Of Registration Office Of The Inspector General Of Registration Santhome

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
22 September, 2017
Judges
  • M Duraiswamy