IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL H.R.R.P NO.11 OF 2018 BETWEEN:
SMT. V.S.LAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS W/O VENKATACHALAPATHY VENKY CHATS, NO.389/32 57TH CROSS, 3RD BLOCK RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU-560 010 …PETITIONER (BY SRI.B.MADHUSUDHAN ADIGA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SRI J.DHIRENDRA KUMAR JAIN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O JUGRAJ. J 2. SMT D.SUREKHA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS W/O J.DHIRENDRA KUMAR JAIN BOTH R/AT NO.137/Y 52ND CROSS, 16TH MAIN 3RD BLOCK RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU-560 010 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHANMUKHAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 &R2) THIS HRRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 46(1) OF THE KARNATAKA RENT ACT, 1999, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 18.09.2017 PASSED BY THE CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, (SCCH-1), BANGALORE IN H.R.C.NO.11/2017 AND ETC.
THIS HRRP COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R No representation for the petitioner.
2. The records show that there was no representation for the petitioner on the previous hearing date also.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents produces the copy of the order in Ex.No.516/2018 which discloses that the possession of the property is already recovered in execution of the impugned decree.
4. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE KG