IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.34575 OF 2015 (GM-FC) Between:
Mr. V.R.Ranganath, S/o M.Ramaiah, Aged About 31 Years, Residing At No.351, M. Ramaiah Layout, Attur Extension, Yelahanka New Town, Bangalore-560 064. …Petitioner (By Sri H.J.Ananda, Advocate) And:
1. Smt. K. Rashmi @ Mohanambika, W/o V.R.Ranganath Aged About 28 Years, 2. Master Abhishek Gowda, S/.o V.R. Ranganath, Aged About 3 Yeras, Rep. By his mother Smt. K.Rashmi, Res. At No.26, Vaikunta, Anchepalya Sirkantapura Nagasandra Post, Bengaluru-560 073. … Respondents (By Sri. G.R.Mohan, Advocate for R1; R2 is minor reptd. by R1) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned order dtd:16.06.2015 as Annexure-B passed by the learned VI Addl. Family Court, Bangalore in C.Mis.80/2010, on an I.A. filed under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. and etc.
This Writ Petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ Group this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that writ petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the same may be dismissed.
Memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE rv