Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

V Nandhini vs Vijay Augastin

Madras High Court|18 January, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

M.V.MURALIDARAN, J.
ub Today, when the Civil Revision Petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner has sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made in the Civil Revision Petition, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No ub To 1.The Family Court, Coimbatore.
18.01.2017 CRP(PD).No.3368 of 2009 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

V Nandhini vs Vijay Augastin

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
18 January, 2017
Judges
  • M V Muralidaran

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.