Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

V Maran vs The Chief Election Commissioner And Others

Madras High Court|24 February, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that this writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous Petition is closed.
24.02.2017 Index:Yes / No Internet:Yes/No ssn To
1. The Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission of India, Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi-100 001.
2. The Electoral Officer, Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.
3. The District Collector, Salem District, Salem.
4. The Returning Officer, 83-Yercaud Assembly Constituency, Salem District.
D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J., ssn W.P.No.31353 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 24.02.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

V Maran vs The Chief Election Commissioner And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
24 February, 2017
Judges
  • D Krishnakumar