IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION No.23143/2019 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
V.M. SPORTS AND RECREATION ASSOCIATION (R) ARALAKUPPE, PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA-571434.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT SRI VIJENDRA ... PETITIONER (BY SRI ARAVIND BABU J, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOME DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560021 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA 571401 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE SRIRANGAPATNA SUB DIVISION SRIRANGAPATNA, MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA 571438 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SRIRANGAPATNA CIRCLE SRIRANGAPATNA MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA 571438 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE RURAL POLICE STATION SRIRANGAPTNA, MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA 571438 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B. BALAKRISHNA, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD:13.12.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-C TO F.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Sri Aravind Babu J, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri B. Balakrishna, Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.
2. The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
3. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 13.12.2018 vide Annexures-C to F.
4. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by an order dated 19.10.2016 passed in Review Petition No.200029/2016.
5. In view of the aforesaid submissions and with a view to maintain parity, writ petition is disposed of with the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall install within a period of six weeks, CC TV cameras, at the places of access to its members and also at all the places, wherein game(s) is / are played by the members. The CC TV footage of atleast prior 15 days’ period shall be made available by the petitioner to the jurisdictional police, as and when called upon to do so.
(ii) The petitioner shall issue identity card(s) to all its member(s), which shall be produced by the member(s), when called upon by the concerned police, during the raid(s), survelliance, etc.
(iii) The petitioner shall not permit any activity by any of its member(s), by indulging in acts of amusement, falling within the definition of Ss.2(14) & 2(15) of the Act and shall not permit any game(s) of chance as per Explanation (II) of Sub-section (7) of Section 2 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The member(s) shall not be allowed to play any kind of game(s) with stakes or make any profit or gain out of the game(s) played.
(iv) The petitioner shall put proper mechanism in place and shall ensure that no game(s) is played in any unlawful manner by the member(s). If the jurisdictional police find the game(s) played is/are contrary to any law and in violation of the settled practice, it is open to them to take action against the petitioner and the offenders, in accordance with law.
(v) The jurisdictional police shall have liberty to visit premises periodically and/or on receipt of any information about any unlawful activity being carried on in the petitioner’s premises.
(vi) The respondents are directed not to interfere with the lawful recreational activities carried on by the members of the petitioner’s – Club/Association.
(vii) It is made clear that this order would not come in the way of the jurisdictional police invoking the provisions of the Act and taking action in accordance with law, if the member(s) of the petitioner is/are found to have indulged in any unlawful or immoral activities.
No order as to costs.
Sd/- JUDGE MD