IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1222 OF 2015 (SP) BETWEEN:
SMT. V.KAVITHA W/O. MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS RESIDING AT AMRUTHI VILLAGE NYAMANAHALLI POST MELUKOTE HOBLI PANDAVAPURA TALUK-571 438 … APPELLANT (BY SRI E.S.INDIRESH, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SMT. GEETHA W/O. LATE SATISH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 2. ABHISHEK S/O. LATE SATISH AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS 3. DARSHAN S/O. LATE SATISH AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS 4. TANUSHRI D/O. LATE SATISH AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS R3 AND R4 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER 1ST RESPONDENT HEREIN ALL ARE RESIDING AT AMRUTHI VILLAGE NYAMANAHALLY POST MELUKOTE HOBLI PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571 438 ... RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:17.01.2015 PASSED IN R.A.NO.151/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANDYA (SITTING AT SRIRANGAPATNA), DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND ALLOWING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.09.2012 PASSED IN O.S.NO.21/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE C.J. (SR. DN) J.M.F.C. AND MACT., PANDAVAPURA.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T No representation for the appellant. Despite granting four opportunities, office objections are not complied. Therefore, appeal is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE KG