Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

V K Keshavamurthy vs Jayamma W/O Kengegowda And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|05 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.52764/2017(KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN V.K. KESHAVAMURTHY, S/O KENGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O 3RD MAIN ROAD, 6TH CROSS, HEMAVATHINAGARA, HASSAN - 573 201. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI GIRISH B BALADARE, ADVOCATE) AND 1. JAYAMMA W/O KENGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O. 3RD MAIN ROAD, 6TH CROSS, HEMAVATHINAGARA, HASSAN - 573 201.
2. V.K. LATHA, D/O KENGEGOWDA, W/O RANGANATHA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O 3RD MAIN ROAD, 6TH CROSS, HEMAVATHINAGARA, HASSAN - 573 201.
3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HASSAN DIVISION, HASSAN - 573 201. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI T.S.MAHANTESH, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 27.9.2017 PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT AT ANNEXURE-F.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that against the order impugned he has a right to seek revision before the competent authority, instead of that he has approached this Court. Hence, he may be permitted to exhaust his remedy to file revision before the competent authority.
His submission is placed on record. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE nd/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

V K Keshavamurthy vs Jayamma W/O Kengegowda And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
05 February, 2019
Judges
  • S N Satyanarayana