Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mr V J Govindarajan vs S Laksman And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|26 March, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.22 OF 2017 (IO) BETWEEN:
MR.V.J.GOVINDARAJAN, S/O LATE DR V.T.JAGADEESWARAN, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.61, 4TH C BLOCK, 9TH MAIN, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU – 560034. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.S.SHIVASWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. S.LAKSMAN, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O LATE SUNDARAMURTHY, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.106, HOYSALA APARTMENTS, CUNNINGHAM CRESCENT ROAD, BENGALURU – 560052.
2. SRI MEENAKSHI AMMAN, KOVIL TRUST, NO.42, SRI MEENAKSHI AMMAN, KOVIL STREET, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560051.
3. MR.V.K.EKAMBARAM, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, RESIDING AT NO.3, WHEELER ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU – 560005.
4. MR.G.ANANTH, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, G7, 300 4TH MAIN, DOMLUR 2ND STAGE, 3RD PHASE, BENGALURU – 560071.
5. MR.M.SUNDARARAJAN, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, C/O SRI MEENAKSHI AMMAN, KOVIL TRUST, SRI MEENAKSHI AMMAN, KOVIL TRUST, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560051.
6. A.K.MADHAVAKRISHNAN, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, NO.64, ST.JOHNS ROAD, BENGALURU – 42.
7. A.G.RAMAKRISHNAN, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, NO.64, ST.JOHNS ROAD, BENGALURU – 42. ...RESPONDENTS **** THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24.11.2016 PASSED ON IA NO.V IN OS NO.1034/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE XIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU, REJECTING THE IA NO.V FILED UNDER ORDER 12 RULE 6 OF CPC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo of even date submitting that petition does not survive for consideration as the O.S.No.1034/2012 before the trial Court was dismissed on 17.08.2018.
2. Considering the submission of the counsel, memo is placed on record.
3. In view of the said memo, revision petition is dismissed as the same has become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE BSR
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mr V J Govindarajan vs S Laksman And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
26 March, 2019
Judges
  • Ashok G Nijagannavar Civil