Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

V Balasundaram And Others vs The Chairman Cum Managing Director

Madras High Court|15 November, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the suit was already settled before the trial Court. Therefore, nothing survives in the Civil revision petition. Hence, the prayer in the civil revision petition has become infructuous.
2. Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as one having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
15.11.2017 ub Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No To
1. The Small Causes Court, Chennai,
2. The XV Small Causes Court (Rent Controller), Chennai.
C.R.P(NPD)No.1707 of 2005
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

V Balasundaram And Others vs The Chairman Cum Managing Director

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
15 November, 2017
Judges
  • M V Muralidaran

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.