Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29316 of 2021 Applicant :- Usman Chaudhary Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kr. Srivastava
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Heard Shri Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Indra Prakash Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State.
A first information report was lodged as Case Crime No.87 of 2021 at Police Station-Hafizpur, District-Hapur under Sections 342, 392, 504 IPC. The bail application of the applicant was rejected by learned Sessions Judge, Hapur on 10.06.2021.
The applicant is in jail since 17.05.2021, pursuant to the said F.I.R.
Shri Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. The applicant was arrested in another case of a false encounter case set up by the police and then named as an accused in this case. Rs.2200/-, countrymade pistol and five live cartridges were planted on the person of the applicant to frame him in the instant criminal case to show proficiency of police investigators. Rs.2200/- belongs to the applicant. There is no independent witness to the recovery.
Learned counsel for the applicant has explained the criminal history of the applicant and further contends that the applicant has become a soft target and a convenient scapegoat for the police authorities who repeatedly nominated him in various cases only to burnish their professional credentials. Lastly it is contended by the learned counsel for applicant that the applicant shall not abscond and will fully cooperate in the criminal law proceedings. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence nor influence the witnesses in any manner.
Learned A.G.A could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. However, he does not contest the criminal history of the applicant as disclosed in the bail application.
Courts have taken notice of the overcrowding of jails during the current pandemic situation (Ref.: Suo Motu Writ Petition (c) No. 1/2020, Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in prisons before the Supreme Court of India). These circumstances shall also be factored in while considering bail applications on behalf of accused persons.
I see merit in the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant and hold that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.
In the light of the preceding discussion and without making any observations on the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant-Usman Chaudhary involved in Case Crime No.87 of 2021 at Police Station- Hafizpur, District-Hapur under Sections 342, 392, 504 IPC, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions.
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not influence any witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.
Order Date :- 22.12.2021 Ashish Tripathi Digitally signed by AJAY BHANOT Date: 2021.12.23 19:36:55 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad