Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Heard Sri A.B.Maurya, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri N.K.Verma, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the impugned FIR as well as material brought on record.
The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 7.9.2017, registered as case crime No.356 of 2017, under Sections 323, 325, 304, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Bhamora, District Bareilly.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to enmity. The petitioner was not present on the spot at the time of the incident. He further submitted that the charge sheet has been submitted against some of the accused persons and no investigation is pending against the petitioner, but the police is harassing the petitioner. The allegations levelled against the petitioner are absolutely false, frivolous and baseless. From a perusal of the FIR, no offence is made out against the petitioner, hence, the same be quashed.
Learned AGA opposed the prayer for quashing of the FIR which discloses cognizable offence.
The Full Bench of this Court in Ajit Singh @ Muraha v. State of U.P. (2006 (56) ACC 433) reiterated the view taken by the earlier Full Bench in Satya Pal v. State of U.P. (2000 Cr.L.J. 569) after considering the various decisions including State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (AIR 1992 SC 604) that there can be no interference with the investigation or order staying arrest unless cognizable offence is not ex-facie discernible from the allegations contained in the F.I.R. or there is any statutory restriction operating on the power of the Police to investigate a case.
From the perusal of the FIR, prima facie it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out. Hence no ground exists for quashing of the F.I.R. or staying the arrest of the petitioner.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 29.5.2018/NS