Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Urmila Rajoura vs District Magistrate And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|12 February, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Heard Shri Alok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1 and Shri Ramendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.2.
Present writ petition is being preferred seeking following reliefs:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the rejection of the petitioner for the allotment of Jhuggi-Jhopadi Residential Flat Scheme Code No.2011-12 (H) (01) Section-10 in the allotted list in which petitioner was allotted as serial no.110 and application no.00262, Urmila Rajaura W/o Ravi Rajaura, R/o Jhuggi No.424, Sector 10.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 for the aforesaid Jhuggi-Jhopadi residential flat scheme code no.2011-12 (H) (01) Sector 10 is allotted in favour of the petitioner."
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is residing at Jhuggi Jhopari Colony, Sector-10, Noida, District Gautam Budh Nagar. In order to keep certain Noida area neat and clean, the authority floated a Scheme in the year 2009-10 to suitably rehabilitate the families, who are unauthorised living in 11565 Jhuggi Jhopari on the land of Noida Authority in Sector-4, 5, 8, 9 and 10. The petitioner was in occupation of the hut in question and her name was earmarked in the joint survey of the Noida Authority and District Administration made in the year 2009-10 but her claim has been illegally rejected on the ground that on the date of inspection, the hut in question was closed.
Shri Ramendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondent authority fairly states that the Scheme in question is for rehabilitation of the down trodden people living in Jhuggi Jhoparis. So far as the spot inspection is concerned, admittedly, on the date of inspection the hut was found closed and as such, she was not found to be covered under the Scheme. There is no illegality or infirmity in the order impugned.
No useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending.
In view of above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction to the respondent authority to examine the case of the petitioner and take a final call strictly in accordance with law, ignoring the impugned order, within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a copy of this order before him.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by the applicants alongwith a self attested identity proof of the said person (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number to which the said Aadhar Card is linked.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 12.2.2021 RKP
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Urmila Rajoura vs District Magistrate And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
12 February, 2021
Judges
  • Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
  • Sanjay Kumar Pachori