Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Urmila Devi vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27889 of 2019 Petitioner :- Urmila Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rishi Kant Singh Chauhan,Krishna Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mahboob Ahmad Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Heard Sri Krishna Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Mahboob Ahmad, learned counsel for respondents no. 2 and 3, Dr. D.K. Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel and have perused the record.
By means of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has raised grievance of non- consideration of her application for shifting of the line for the purposes of her convenience.
In our considered opinion, when a consumer approaches the licensee for the purposes of any correction or amendment in the electricity connection including the supply line, it is the duty cast under the Supply Act, 2005 upon the authority to look into the grievance and pass order either way.
In such circumstances the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the grievance of the petitioner, as raised in her application dated 3rd of June, 2019, shall be looked into by the concerned Executive Engineer who shall pass a reasoned and speaking order within four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of the order.
Order Date :- 22.8.2019 Nadeem Ahmad
(Ajit Kumar,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Urmila Devi vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 August, 2019
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Rishi Kant Singh Chauhan Krishna Kumar Singh