Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Upendra Singh And Others vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 32
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1611 of 2018
Revisionist :- Upendra Singh And 8 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Shashi Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionists and learned A.G.A.
Revisionists by the instant revision are challenging the order dated 06.03.2018 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kasganj, S.T. No. 123/2016 (State vs. Banti @ Shyam Singh & others), Crime No. 290/2015, under Sections 147, 148, 307, 323, 354, 504 IPC, P.S. Sidhpura, District Kasganj, whereby, the revisionists have been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. as the revisionist no. 7 has been summoned u/s 147, 148, 323, 354, 307, 504 IPC while other revisionist u/s 147, 323, 354, 504 IPC.
After advancing argument at length, learned counsel for the revisionists would submit that revisionists would be satisfied in case a direction is issued to the court below to consider the bail application of the revisionists in terms of the decisions rendered in Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P., 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC).
Learned A.G.A. would submit that the directions issued by this Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court is binding upon the court below. A Division Bench of this Court in Brahm Singh & others vs. State of U.P. & others, 2016 (7) ADJ 151, has already issued direction to all the Sessions Judges of the State of Uttar pradesh, which is being followed. It is, therefore, urged that no fresh direction is required to be given.
This fact is not being disputed by the learned counsel for the revisionists.
In regard thereto, application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the revisionists to file an appropriate application for bail before the court below within four weeks from date in terms of the decisions rendered in Amrawati (supra) as well as Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh (supra).
In the event, such an application is filed, it is expected that the court below shall decide/dispose of the application in terms of Amrawati (supra), Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh (supra) and Brahm Singh (supra), strictly in accordance with law.
It is clarified that the Court has not considered the contention of the learned counsel for the revisionists on merit.
Order Date :- 28.5.2018 Mukesh Kr.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Upendra Singh And Others vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 May, 2018
Judges
  • Suneet Kumar
Advocates
  • Shashi Kumar Mishra