Court No. - 21
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 496 of 2000 Appellant :- Union of India Respondent :- Haji Chiraguddin Bachchoo Singh Counsel for Appellant :- Jagannath Singh,Dr. Santosh Kumar Tiwari,Praveen Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
Order on Civil Misc. Review Application No. 38619 of 2000
Union of India has preferred this review. Learned Judge issued notice way back in the year 2014.
While considering the factual data, the judgment of learned Judge in first appeal from order is well reasoned order. The notice of claim was not given. The notice might have been served on the General Manager. In view of the admission in paragraph 14 of the written statement, the claim of the applicant was repudiated at claim stage. Decision in Board of Control for Cricket, India and another v. Netaji Cricket Club and others, AIR 2005 SC 592 has been pressed into service but, in the case in hand, there is no mistake committed by the Court in nature of fact or law.
A Division Bench of this Court while dealing with review application preferred in Income Tax Appeal No.15 of 2015 (Commissioner of Income Tax Central, Kanpur v. Kesarwani Zarda Bhandar Sahso, Alld) decided on 21.9.2017 has discussed the contours for entertaining review as propounded by the Apex Court time and again.
The order under review cannot be found fault with. The contours for entertaining review are not made out.
In view of the above, this review application is dismissed.
Order Date :- 17.12.2021 DKS