Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Umesh @ Teetu vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|13 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 50
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12979 of 2021 Applicant :- Umesh @ Teetu Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vipin Kumar
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
Sri Sushil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the instant anticipatory bail application has rendered infructuous and it may be dismissed as infructuous.
The instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 13.8.2021 S Rawat
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Umesh @ Teetu vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
13 August, 2021
Judges
  • Arvind Kumar Mishra I
Advocates
  • Sushil Kumar Pandey

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.