Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Umesh Dutt Pandey & 3 Ors. vs Chief Development Officer, ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 August, 2014

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Mahendra Dayal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage itself.
The petitioners are tenure holder of plot nos. 9, 99, 102, 730, over which road has been constructed by the Public Works Department.
Grievance of the petitioners is that without any acquisition or requisition under the Act, the opposite parties are constructing the road/chak marg over their agricultural land and as such, they preferred representation dated 8.7.2003 Pratapgarh to the District Magistrate, but no heed was paid.
Counsel for the petitioners has also submits that requisite compensation may be awarded in case Public Works Department wants to construct the road over the plot in question. He further submits that till date no compensation has been made.
Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, we direct the competent authority i.e. Block Development Officer, Shivgarh, Pratapgarh to determine the compensation and pay the same within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.
With these observations, the writ petition is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 20.8.2014 Muk
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Umesh Dutt Pandey & 3 Ors. vs Chief Development Officer, ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 August, 2014
Judges
  • Rajiv Sharma
  • Mahendra Dayal