Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Umesh Chand Yadav vs Basic Shiksha Adhikari Mainpuri & Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 26950 of 2001 Petitioner :- Umesh Chand Yadav Respondent :- Basic Shiksha Adhikari Mainpuri & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.K. Rathore Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
"I. Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of certiorari, thereby quashing the impugned order dated 15.6.2001 contained in Annexure-6 to the writ petition.
II. Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus, thereby directing the respondents not to recover any amount from the salary of the petitioner."
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 27.4.2018 Siddhant Sahu
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Umesh Chand Yadav vs Basic Shiksha Adhikari Mainpuri & Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 April, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • R K Rathore