Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Umashankar vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 68
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 21691 of 2019 Applicant :- Umashankar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Brijesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A. G. A. for the State.
This application U/s 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to quash the order dated 24.10.2016 issuing non bailable warrant passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 10, Agra in Complaint Case No. 258 of 2013 (Chokhe Lal Vs. Umashankar) under Sections 406, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Etmauddaula, District Agra.
Learned counsel for the applicant contended that the applicant was not aware about the proceedings of the Trial Court. Accordingly, applicant could not appear before the Trial Court and impugned order issuing non bailable warrant has been passed.
Whether proceedings of the Trial Court was known to the applicant or not, cannot be decided by this Court without perusal of record of lower court. Accordingly, it is not appropriate for this Court to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
In view of the above, the prayer for quashing the impugned order passed in the aforesaid case is refused.
However, none of the aforesaid offences against applicant is punishable with imprisonment for more than seven years. All the materials relevant for disposal of bail application is available on record before trial court/court concerned.
In view of order passed by this Court in the case of Smt. Sakeena and others Vs. State, and another reported in 2018 (2) ACR 2190, it is directed that in case the applicant file his bail application, prayer for bail shall be considered and decided on the same day. If for any reason it is not possible to decide the regular bail application on the same day, then prayer for interim bail shall be considered and decided on the same day.
For a period of 60 days from today or till the applicant surrenders and applies for bail, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him.
With the above directions, this application U/s 482 Cr.P.C., is disposed of. Order Date :- 30.5.2019 Jaswant
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Umashankar vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 May, 2019
Judges
  • Umesh Chandra Tripathi
Advocates
  • Brijesh Kumar Srivastava