Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Uma Ads #583 vs State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|22 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.50357/2013(GM-FOR) BETWEEN:
UMA ADS #583, PUSHPAGIRI APARTMENTS UNIT #8, 4TH MAIN 10TH D CROSS MAHALAKSHMIPURAM BANGALORE 560086 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI V S RAVI S/O LATE SUBBANNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY, ADV.) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA RERESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO DEPARTMENT OF FOREST AND ENVIRONMENT 4TH FLOOR, M S BUILDING BENGALURU 560 001 2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, ARANYA BHAVAN MALLESWARAM BANGALORE 560003 3. THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST BANGALORE URBAN DIVISION BANGALORE 560 003 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER VIDE ANNEXURE-A DATED 1.8.2013 MADE BY THE R-3 AND ORDER VIDE ANNEXURE-B DATED 4.9.2013 MADE BY THE R-2 & DIRECT THE R-3 TO PERMIT THE PETITIOENR TO COMPLETE THE BALANCE WORK WITH REGARD TO THE ADVERTISEMENT HOARDINGS AND DISPLY ADVERTISEMENT ON THE SAID HOARDINGS.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.
Memo is placed on record.
In view of the memo filed, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE DM
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Uma Ads #583 vs State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
22 February, 2019
Judges
  • H T Narendra Prasad