Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

M/S Ukn Esperanza A Registered Partnership And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|27 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION Nos.12720-12723/2014 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
1. M/S. UKN ESPERANZA A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM WITH ITS OFFICE AT 10TH FLOOR GAMA BLOCK, SIGMA SOFT TECH PARK NO.7, WHITEFIELD MAIN ROAD BANGALORE-560 066.
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR. SUNDARESH M GENERAL MANAGER-PROJECTS.
2. MR LAKSHMANA RAJU S/O LATE K VENKATA RAJU AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.487 9TH MAIN, 3RD CROSS HAL II STAGE, INDIRANAGAR BANGALORE 560038 REPRESENTED BY HIS ATTORNEY MR. SUDHIR KUMAR MISHRA 3. MR RAMESH T.M S/O MUNIYAPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS NO.409, VIPUL SPRING MANOR FLAT A3, 4TH FLOOR,11TH MAIN 9TH CROSS, BEML LAYOUT THUBARAHALLI RAMAGONDANAHALLI PO BANGALORE - 560066 4. MR N H BHASKAR REDDY S/O LATE. N H P SHIVA REDDY AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS NO.1079/4, 13TH A MAIN ROAD HAL 3RD STAGE, NEW THIPPASANDRA INDRANAGAR, BANGALORE 560075.
... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.P.B. AJIT, ADV.) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, BANGALORE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE 560 001 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER VARTHUR POLICE STATION VARTHUR, BANGALORE 560087 3. MR N NARASA REDDY S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RESIDENT OF TUBARAHALLI VILLAGE RAMAGONDANAHALLI POST VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE 560066 4. MR N KRISHNA REDDY S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS RESIDENT OF TUBARAHALLI VILLAGE RAMAGONDANAHALLI POST VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE 560066 5. MR N ASWATHANARAYANA REDDY S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDENT OF TUBARAHALLI VILLAGE RAMAGONDANAHALLI POST VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE 560066 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA. FOR R1 & R2, SRI. G.R. LAKSHMIPATHI REDDY, ADV. FOR R4 & R5, R3 IS SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R1 & R2 TO REGISTER COMPLAINT/INITIATE PROCEEDINGS/ TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION AGAINST THE R3 TO R5 IN TERMS OF THE COMPLAINTS BOTH DT.24TH FEB 2014, VIDE ANNEXURE-P & Q RESPECTIVELY IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW & ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R In these writ petitions, the petitioners are seeking direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to register complaint/initiate proceedings/to take appropriate action against respondent Nos.3 to 5 in terms of the complaint dated 24.2.2014 (Annexures-P and Q).
2. The learned AGA has filed a memo along with endorsement issued by respondents stating that pursuant to the complaint dated 24.12.2014 filed by the petitioners, the respondent No.2 has recorded the statements of respondent Nos.4 and 5 and issued an endorsement dated 26.2.2014 to the petitioners stating that the statement of respondent Nos.4 & 5 is recorded and your complaint is closed.
3. Since, the complaint filed by the petitioners has been considered and endorsement has been issued to the petitioners, these petitions do not survive for consideration.
4. If the petitioners have any grievance, they can challenge the endorsement dated 26.2.2014 before competent legal forum, if law permits.
5. With the above observation, the petitions are disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE DM
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S Ukn Esperanza A Registered Partnership And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2019
Judges
  • H T Narendra Prasad