Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Udaysinh vs Joint

High Court Of Gujarat|22 June, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1. Learned advocate for the seeks permission to delete the name of the applicant nos. 2 and 4, who were trustees, have expired. Learned advocate for the Respondent No. 1 also seeks permission to delete the name of Respondent No. 3 to 8 who have resigned as trustees. Further, the learned advocates seek permission for amendment in the civil application. permission is granted.
2. There is a delay of 150 days in preferring the first appeal.
3. So far as the respondent no. 1 the charity commissioner, is concerned, advocate for the respondent no.1 Mr. Upadhyay has filed sick note and Mr. Panchal, learned advocate for the respondents has no objection if condonation of delay for 150 days is granted. Condonation of Delay of 150 days is granted.
(M.D.Shah, J.) *f.kazi Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Udaysinh vs Joint

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
22 June, 2012