Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Uday Pal vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 14
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10227 of 2018 Applicant :- Uday Pal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Brajesh Kumar Solanki Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today on behalf of the applicant is taken on record.
Heard Sri Brajesh Kumar Solanki, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. Perused the record.
This bail application has been moved by the applicant Uday Pal who is involved in Case Crime No. 544 of 2017, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangster & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station-Kadarchowk, District-Budaun.
Learned counsel for the applicant contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. No offence, whatsoever, is made out against the applicant, who is innocent. Absolutely vague and bald allegations have been levelled against the applicant. There are three cases against the applicant shown in the gang chart, on which he is on bail. Copy of bail orders have been annexed at Annexure No. 3 and 4 of the affidavit appended to the bail application. Learned counsel for the applicant further contended that one case is of firing on police personnel and the second one is at case crime no. 469 of 2017 under Sections 395, 397, 412 IPC, in which the applicant was not named in the FIR. The applicant has no other criminal history. The applicant undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty of bail, if the same is granted to him. Applicant is in jail since 19.11.2017.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail. However, he admitted the fact that there is criminal history of three cases against the applicant.
There is no evidence on record to show that the applicant was indulged in activity with violence or threat or show of violence, or intimidation, or coercion and that activity has been done with the object of disturbing public order or of gaining any undue temporal, pecuniary, material or other advantage for himself or any other person.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I find it a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Let the applicant-Uday Pal be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
Accordingly, the instant bail application is allowed. Order Date :- 27.3.2018 Jaswant
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Uday Pal vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 March, 2018
Judges
  • Umesh Chandra Tripathi
Advocates
  • Brajesh Kumar Solanki