Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Tvl.Rajtyres vs The Commissioner Of Commercial ...

Madras High Court|05 April, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned Additional Government Pleader earlier stated that this is a case, where the reversal of input tax credit and levy of tax the due to purchase supersession are challenged on various grounds. The assessing authority has recorded that the suppression of purchases by the assessee as per the details collected through department internet has not been disproved by materials and hence the proposed assessment was confirmed by the Assessing Officer. This Court after going through the records, requested the Additional Government Pleader to verify whether the Department can consider the documents now made available by the assessee.
2. The learned Additional Government Pleader, after getting instructions reported that the petitioner has got some case on the basis of the records now produced by the assessee before this Court. Hence, the learned Additional Government Pleader also agree with this Court that the petitioner may be given an opportunity by remitting the matter to the Assessing Authority. However, the Learned Additional Government Pleader requested this Court to direct the petitioner to deposit 30% of the tax demanded as per the impugned proceedings.
3.Considering the submissions of learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for the respondent, this Court is of the view that the impugned order can be set aside and the matter can be remitted to the assessing authority to pass fresh order on merits after giving an opportunity to the petitioner to submit his reply to the proposed revision of tax and to produce records.
4.Hence, this Court pass following order.
The impugned order by proceedings reference TIN:33705362885/2014-2015 dated 09.12.2016 is set aside and the matter is remitted to the assessing authority namely the second respondent. The petitioner is directed to file his reply to the proposed revision notice dated 28.09.2016. The petitioner is also permitted to produce the documents within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Thereafter, the second respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's reply and documents in accordance with law and on merits within a period of 6 weeks thereafter. The petitioner is directed to pay 30% of Rs.6,11,920/- within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5.The Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous petition is closed.
To
1.The Commissioner of commercial taxes, O/o The principal and special Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai ? 600 005.
2.The Commercial Tax Officer-II, Palani ? II Assessment Circle, No.12, 1st Cross Street, R.S.Ramalingam Street, Shanmugapuram, Palani, Dindugal District- 624 601.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Tvl.Rajtyres vs The Commissioner Of Commercial ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
05 April, 2017