Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Tvl.Kalpataru Steels vs The Commercial Tax Officer

Madras High Court|19 January, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1.Issue Notice. Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. With the consent of learned counsels for parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal.
2.This writ petition pertains to the assessment year 2014-15. By virtue of this writ petition, challenge is laid to the order dated 05.12.2016, confined to issue nos.1 and 4.
3.Insofar as the issue no.1 is concerned, it is covered by the judgment of this Court dated 09.09.2016 passed in W.A.No.775 of 2016 (The Assistant Commissioner (CT) Vs. M/s.Infiniti Wholesale Ltd.).
4.Insofar as the issue no.4 is concerned, I am informed that controversy which arises qua, the said issue also arises in W.P.No.4263 of 2015, in which, notice has been issued by this Court vide order dated 02.03.2015. I am further informed that interim stay has also been granted by this Court vide the very same order.
5.Insofar as the issue no.4 is concerned, at page 113 of the typed set of papers total ITC reversal has been arrived at Rs.7,24,656/- while summarizing the case, the demand ITC reversal has been shown as Rs.1,48,76,640/-.
6.Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, says that there is typographical error.
7.In these circumstances, petitioner is given liberty to file a rectification petition under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, qua, issue no.4.
8.As noticed above, issue no.1 is covered by the judgment of this Court dated 09.09.2016 passed in W.A.No.775 of 2016 (The Assistant Commissioner (CT) Vs. M/s.Infiniti Wholesale Ltd.). Hence, no further orders are required in the writ petition. The impugned order insofar as the issue no.1 is concerned is set aside with liberty to pass a fresh order, if necessary, vis-a-vis issue no.1.
9.The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the aforementioned directions. Consequently, connected pending applications are closed. No costs.
19.01.2017 pri Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/ No RAJIV SHAKDHER,J.
pri To The Commercial Tax Officer, Harbour Assessment Circle, No.116, Angappanaicken Street, Chennai.
W.P.No.1318 of 2017 And W.M.P.Nos.1249 and 1250 of 2017 19.01.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Tvl.Kalpataru Steels vs The Commercial Tax Officer

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
19 January, 2017