Court No. - 24
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20687 of 2018 Applicant :- Tuntun Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Kumar Chaurasia Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants are on bail in cases shown in the gang chart. The applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case and they have not committed the present offence. It was further argued that only one case is shown in the bail rejection order. Crime no. 1036 of 2014 is not mentioned in the bail rejection order nor the applicants were taken into custody nor they have any concern with that case. They are languishing in jail and in case they are released on bail, they will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial. It is further submitted that no bail cancellation application has been moved till today regarding the cases shown in the Gang Chart.
On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, provision for initiation of cases and release of the accused in U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicants Tuntun Singh and Suryabhan Pal involved in Case Crime No. 486 of 2016, under Section 2/3 (1) U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Chitbadagaon, District - Ballia be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicants will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicants will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicants will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicants shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected, of the commission of which they are suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this court.
Order Date :- 31.5.2018 Sachdeva