Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Tuntun Kumar vs Union Of India

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1694 of 2019 Petitioner :- Tuntun Kumar Respondent :- Union Of India, Through Secretary Home Affairs, New Delhi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Narendra Kumar,Pawan Kumar Yadav,Shailendra Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Sabhajeet Singh
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
On the last occasion, learned counsel for the Union respondent was directed to obtain instructions. The said instructions are taken on the record and which for the purposes of identification are marked as "X".
From the instructions and more particularly paragraph -8 thereof, the Court notes that the petitioner of his own volition admitted before the respondents that he had engaged the services of a broker who sat and took the written examination. It was in that context that his candidature was not processed further. Significantly, no disclosure in respect of this admission as made before the respondents is made in the writ petition.
Consequently, the writ petition fails and is dismissed.
Order Date :- 26.2.2019 Arun K. Singh (Yashwant Varma, J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Tuntun Kumar vs Union Of India

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 February, 2019
Judges
  • Yashwant Varma
Advocates
  • Narendra Kumar Pawan Kumar Yadav Shailendra Kumar Verma