Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

T.Subramani vs The Director General

Madras High Court|06 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by HULUVADI G.RAMESH,J.) Mr.V.P.Sengottuvel, learned counsel takes notice for the respondents.
2. The case of the appellant is that he joined the Central Reserve Police Force as Constable (GD) on 05.03.1992 and was promoted as Head Constable (HC/GD) on 31.01.2011. When he was serving in the 063 Battalion, stationed at Faizabad (UP), he suffered from renal failure and the same was diagnosed on 06.06.2012. Thereafter, on 07.12.2012, he was posted at 105 Rapid Action Force and stationed at Coimbatore. The Inspector General/Director (Medical), Hyderabad, accorded permission on 20.02.2013 to avail treatment for Chronic Kidney Disease in K.G.Hospital, Coimbatore, which is a recognized hospital. Since then he was taking treatment and underwent Hemodialysis. The appellant was asked to perform light duties since then and accordingly, he is performing the same without any blemish whatsoever till date. While so, the request of the appellant/writ petitioner seeking retention in the 105 RAF at Coimbatore, was rejected by the second respondent vide proceedings dated 11.05.2017. As against the said order, the writ petition was filed. After elaborate discussion and position of law on the issue, the learned Single Judge, dismissed the writ petition. Hence, the present appeal.
3. It appears that the appellant is now transferred to Chhattisgarh. On a perusal of the materials placed on record, including the medical records, we find that the appellant is seriously affected by the renal failure, and is also undergoing treatment in K.G.Hospital, Coimbatore. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we are of the view that for another period of six months to 8 months, the appellant shall be retained in the present place, so as to enable him to continue his medical treatment. However, the appellant is directed to report to the new place on or before 01.04.2018.
The Writ Appeal is disposed of accordingly. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

T.Subramani vs The Director General

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
06 September, 2017