Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Triyogi Narayan Pandey vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 July, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22516 of 2021 Applicant :- Triyogi Narayan Pandey Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Satish Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ali Zamin,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No.949 of 2020, under Sections 379 & 411 IPC, P.S. Manjhanpur, District Kaushambi.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that according to FIR version, on 18.12.2020 a Santro Car No.UP 73 D-5969 was stolen, which was recovered on 09.03.2021 from the possession of applicant. He further submits that on 02.02.2021 an altercation of the applicant took place with the neighbour regarding which applicant moved an application to the police regarding false implication of the applicant by neighbour. The applicant has criminal huistory of five cases and in all the cases he has been enlarged on bail, which has been explained in para 16 of bail application. He also submits that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and, in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail and the applicant is languishing in jail since 06.04.2021.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant and submits that the stolen Santro Car has been recovered from the possesssion of the applicant, therefore, he is not entitled for bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, nature of offence & punishment provided and perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, the applicant is entitled for bail, let the applicant- Triyogi Narayan Pandey involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions :-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he will not tamper with the evidence and will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and will cooperate with the trial. The applicant shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground of cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 30.7.2021 MAA/-
Digitally signed by Justice Ali Zamin Date: 2021.07.30 16:36:19 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Triyogi Narayan Pandey vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 July, 2021
Judges
  • Ali Zamin
Advocates
  • Satish Sharma