Court No. - 62
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2931 of 2002 Petitioner :- Triveni Prasad Shukla Respondent :- Asstt. Provident Fund Commissioner & Another Counsel for Petitioner :- B.M. Pandey,S.K.Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- S. Chaturvedi,Jagdish Pathak,R.P.Singh,SC
Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
Case is called out in the revised list.
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition. Sri Jagdish Pathak, learned counsel for the respondent is present.
This writ petition is of the year 2002 and is lying dormant for the last several years. Record of the writ petition shows that no serious effort has been made by the petitioner to get the case heard.
I have perused the record.
From the record, it transpires that either cause of action does not survive or the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to move recall application, in case, cause of action is still surviving or dismissal of the writ petition causes any prejudice to his interest.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged. No order as to cost.
Order Date :- 27.2.2018 Akbar