Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Triloki Nath Pathak vs State Of U P Thru Secy Min Of Basic Edu And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 25
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 19921 of 2006 Petitioner :- Triloki Nath Pathak Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Min. Of Basic Edu. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhanshu Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Sri Anshumali Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri Sudhanshu Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioner informs that the writ petition has become infructuous due to passage of time.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 20.12.2019 S. Singh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Triloki Nath Pathak vs State Of U P Thru Secy Min Of Basic Edu And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 December, 2019
Judges
  • Vipin Chandra Dixit
Advocates
  • Sudhanshu Pandey

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.