Court No. - 30
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 416 of 2019 Petitioner :- Triloki Nath Dubey Respondent :- State Of U P And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jaya Nath Patel Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manoj Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents and Sri Manoj Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent-Gaon Sabha and perused the record.
With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.
Present petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the respondent no. 2, 3 and 4 to remove illegal encroachment of the respondent no. 6 to 8 over the arazi no. 53 area 0.1420 hectare situated at village Bodepur, Pargana Ghisua, Police Station Pawara, Tehsil Machhalishahar, District Jaunpur which is registered as Naveen Parti (Public utility land) in the revenue record of fasli year 1425-1430 and to take necessary action against responsible person.
In view of the aforesaid, it would serve no purpose to keep the writ petition pending, and therefore, it is directed that petitioner may submit a representation before the Assistant Collector bringing the relevant facts regarding encroachment over the aforesaid plot to the notice of the concerned Assistant Collector who, if no proceedings under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 have already been registered in relation to encroachment over the said plot, on receiving the aforesaid representation shall inquire into the allegations made by the petitioner after following the procedure prescribed under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 read with Rule 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code Rules, 2016 and pass appropriate orders within a period of three months from the date when the aforesaid representation is filed by the petitioner. In case the allegations of the petitioner are found to be true the Assistant Collector shall ensure that the encroachments over the Gaon Sabha land are removed within a period of one month thereafter unless the order of Assistant Collector is stayed by any It is clarified that this Court has not adjudicated upon the merits of the claim as raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition.
With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 25.2.2019 Abhishek