Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

M/S Tractors And Farm Equipment ... vs M/S Tafe Paddy Harvesting Machine

Madras High Court|23 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Counsel for the plaintiff present and heard.
2. Inasmuch as the defendant has been set ex-parte, it was referred to the learned Master for recording ex-parte evidence. After completion of recording of evidence, the matter is listed before this Court for further orders.
3. The suit laid by the plaintiff is for declaration as regards registered trademark, direction towards payment of damages and permanent injunction.
4. In support of the plaintiff's case, PW-1 has been examined and Exs.P-1 to P-42 have been marked. The evidence of PW-1 and documents marked as Exs. P1 to P42 are perused cumulatively. It is found that the plaintiff-Company has established its claim.
5. In conclusion, the Civil Suit is decreed as prayed with costs.
23.06.2017 Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No adl T.RAVINDRAN, J.
adl C.S.No.796 of 2011 and O.A.No.991 of 2011 23.06.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S Tractors And Farm Equipment ... vs M/S Tafe Paddy Harvesting Machine

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
23 June, 2017