Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Tota Ram vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9337 of 2019 Petitioner :- Tota Ram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamal Nayan Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner is working as daily wage employee with the Divisional Forest Officer, Rampur.
By the instant petition, petitioner seeks the following relief:
"I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the minimum pay scale in favour of the petitioner under the purview of 7thy Pay Commission report."
Learned Standing Counsel submits that the third respondent shall pass appropriate order on the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law.
In view thereof, on consent, the petition is disposed of directing the third respondent, Divisional Forest Officer, Rampur, to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, by a reasoned and speaking order, expeditiously, preferably, within three months from the date of filing of certified copy of this order along with the copy of the writ petition.
It is clarified that the Court has not considered the claim of the petitioner on merits.
Order Date :- 31.5.2019 K.K. Maurya
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Tota Ram vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 May, 2019
Judges
  • Suneet Kumar
Advocates
  • Kamal Nayan Shukla